USPTO serial 76040407
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan H. Opalko
Bryan H. Opalko Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC501 Grant StreetSuite 200Pittsburgh, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, HARDWARE AND PERIPHERAL DEVICES FOR DISPLAYING, MANIPULATING AND ANALYZING MULTI-DIMENSIONAL IMAGES FOR ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING ENGINEERING DATABASES; COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR CONNECTING TO AND TRANSFERRING DATA ACROSS THE INTERNET, INTRANETS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2025 | NCS8 | NOTICE OF CANCELLATION SEC. 8 EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Nov 21, 2024 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| May 14, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |