USPTO serial 76040469
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan H. Opalko
Bryan H. Opalko BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC501 Grant StreetSuite 200PITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELDS OF ENGINEERING, PRODUCT AND PROCESS MANUFACTURING, METALWORKING, AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND RELATED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR USE IN BUSINESS METHODS OPTIMIZATION, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, [ ELECTRONIC COMMERCE UTILIZATION, ] LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, WEB-BASED CONTENT MANAGEMENT, AND HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES FOR DEVELOPMENT, SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY; TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF CHEMICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, THERMOPHYSICAL, AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF ITEMS; TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES UNDER HIGH TEMPERATURE, HIGH PRESSURE, HIGH STRAIN OR HIGH STRESS CONDITIONS; METALLOGRAPHY AND MATERIALS CLASSIFICATION; TESTING OF LABORATORIES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR ACCURACY, PRECISION, QUALITY ASSURANCE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY CONDITIONS; CALIBRATION OF TESTING AND ANALYSIS INSTRUMENTS; CONSULTATION SERVICES REGARDING METHODS OF TESTING AND ANALYSIS, AND OPERATION OF LABORATORIES | ACTIVE | Apr 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 22, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 22, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |