USPTO serial 76040747
CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 24, 2004
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Johnstown, PA
Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan H. Opalko
Bryan H. Opalko BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PCSuite 200501 Grant StreetPITTSBURGH, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROGRAMMING SERVICES, NAMELY, DETECTION AND CORRECTION OF SOFTWARE BUGS, VIRUSES AND FLAWS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND MODIFICATION FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF WEB PAGES AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; WEB SITE DESIGN, CREATION, HOSTING AND MAINTENANCE; DESIGN, CONFIGURATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Apr 3, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 30, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |