USPTO serial 76041073
NEWLINK GENETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEWLINK GENETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod Kubat
NYEMASTER, GOODE, VOIGTS, W HANSELL700 WALNUT, STE 1600DES MOINES, IA 50309-3899Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Photographs and printed instructional and teaching material containing information about the use of proprietary genomic and therapeutic products used for prevention and treatment of diseases in the human body | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Medical and scientific research relating to the development and sale of genomic and therapeutic products for prevention and treatment of diseases in the human body | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NewLink Genetics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by NewLink Genetics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NEWLINK GENETICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 26, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |