USPTO serial 76041106
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Gray IV
ANDREW J GRAY IV PENNIE & EDMONDS, LLP3300 HILLVIEW AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | wireless communication devices, namely, cordless telephones, cellular telephones, cellular base stations, cellular terminals and integrated circuits for use in such wireless communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |