USPTO serial 76041230
BABIES N BEYOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABIES N BEYOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Luis A. Uriuare
LUIS A URIUARE941 FOURTH ST #200MIAMI BEACH, FL 33139UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online gift certificate services in the field of children's clothes and products, namely shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, shoes, hats, maternity related clothing, toys, diaper bags, baby bottles, strollers, cribs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |