USPTO serial 76041662
COHERE CONSOLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COHERE CONSOLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy J. Pifher
WENDY J PIFHER HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200P O BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, ON THE SUBJECT OF SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, ON-LINE AND NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN AND COMPUTER UTILITY SERVICES; COMPUTER NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER HOSTING OF PROPRIETARY AND NON-PROPRIETARY THIRD-PARTY SOFTWARE AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER AND PROVIDING TEMPORARY ON-LINE USE OF THESE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS VIA INTRANETS, VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORKS, EXTRANETS OR VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |