USPTO serial 76042301
REAL WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REAL WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia V5T 1H4, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V5T 1H4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY L. MICHELMAN
JEFFREY L. MICHELMAN STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP168 NORTH MERAMEC AVENUE, SUITE 400ST. LOUIS, MO 63105-3763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Script and screen writing; film and video production; production of television and radio programs; animation production services; presentation of live show performances; translation of all the aforesaid content into other languages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |