USPTO serial 76042358
FULL SPECTRUM 2000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULL SPECTRUM 2000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay F Moldovanyi
JAY F MOLDOVANYI FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | car care products, namely, creams, rust protectors, lotions and waxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | computer software for use in database management and financial calculations in the field of automobile dealership management support | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | advertising services for others, namely, direct mail advertising through newspapers, periodicals and automotive infomercials; providing an on-line computer database relating to automobile pricing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | providing an on-line computer database relating to automobile financing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARBIZ.COM INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named FULL SPECTRUM 2000
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |