USPTO serial 76042646
SMARTBOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTBOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Connaughton
PATRICIA CAROTHERS DA5ASHLAND INC5200 BLAZER PKWYDUBLIN, OH 43017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives for joining plastic for industrial and consumer applications, namely, food and beverage packaging and excluding adhesives for dental purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHLAND INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Triton Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Triton Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named SMARTBOND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |