USPTO serial 76042714
VERITECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERITECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey, Esq., Sylvia D. Davis, Esq.
ROGER P FUREY ESQ SYLVIA D DAVIS E KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer network security services; designing security programs for computer networks and providing related consulting services; monitoring of network security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |