USPTO serial 76042897
LAHONTAN VENTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAHONTAN VENTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth L. Plitzuweit
ELIZABETH L PLITZUWEIT MESSERLI & KRAMMER PA1800 FIFTH ST TOWERS150 S FIFTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4218Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Investment services in the field of private and public securities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crescendo Ventures Management, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Crescendo Ventures Management, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named LAHONTAN VENTURES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |