USPTO serial 76042958
COVISINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COVISINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C BLATTNER
JOHN C BLATTNER BUTZEL LONG350 S MAIN STE 300ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | procurement services for manufacturers and suppliers; purchasing and online ordering services for manufacturers and suppliers; providing on-line auctioning and ordering services through on-line catalogs of goods and services; business management services for others, namely, electronic business consulting service, supply chain management services; business and advertising services, namely, advertising agencies, strategic business consulting, business marketing consultation, providing online information database services for business transactions among manufactures and suppliers; promoting cultural events, sporting events, contests and promotions of others; business consulting services in the field of e-commerce services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COVISINT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by COVISINT, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ford Motor Company
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named COVISINT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |