USPTO serial 76042965
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SE-164 74 KISTA, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V DINEFF DINEFF TRADEMARK LAW LIMITED820 W JACKSON BLVD STE 370CHICAGO, IL 60607UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized database management in the field of wireless communication, namely, collecting data, input and systematization of information; product demonstrations; providing information, namely, product listings; business information in connection with the selling of chattel; arranging of fairs and exhibitions in the field of wireless communication for commercial purposes via global computer networks; advertisement space on web sites; providing shoppers' guide information via global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Investment brokerage in the field of chattels; insurance brokerage in the field of chattel insurance, home insurance and accident insurance; financial services, namely, loans | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication and data communication services, namely, electronic transmission of messages and data; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning retail services; electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |