USPTO serial 76043143
E-MEDSYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-MEDSYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN SOKOL
STEVEN SOKOL ]AGAPAY LEVYN & HALLING LLP10801 NATIONAL BLVD 4TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-4184UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | MEDICAL PRACTICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM THAT RUNS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTERIZED NETWORK THE CUSTOMER CAN PURCHASE USE OF THE SOFTWARE AND CONNECT OVER THE GLOBAL COMPUTERIZED NETWORK TO A CENTRALIZED COMPUTER SERVER OR PURCHASE THE SOFTWARE AND RUN ON THE CUSTOMER'S OWN SERVER PROGRAM CAPABILITIES INCLUDE PATIENT REGISTRATION, PATIENT AND INSURANCE BILLING, COLLECTIONS, APPOINTMENT SCHEDULING AND RECALL ELECTRONIC COMMERCE SUCH AS ELECTRONIC CLAIMS, ELECTRONIC REMITTANCE, ELIGIBILITY AND AUTHORIZATIONS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE | ACTIVE | Oct 25, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |