USPTO serial 76043289
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SE-164 74 KISTA, SE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurel V. Dineff
LAUREL V DINEFF HOFFMANN & DINEFF, LTD820 W JACKSON BLVDSTE 370CHICAGO, IL 60607| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Putting together, input and systematization of information in data bases; product demonstrations; listing of product assortment; commercial information services; customer information in connection with selling of chattels; brokerage concerning chattels; on-line information regarding shopping; arranging of fairs and exhibitions for commercial purposes via global networks; marketing services and advertising services; providing consumer information on-line | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Insurance services; financial affairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Tele communication services and data communication services including computer-aided transmission of messages and images; transmission of data from data bases to user apparatus to provide electronic shopping and interactive services, including games and chat; electronic mail, news services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |