USPTO serial 76043828
ENERGYDIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENERGYDIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jose Blas Lorenzo
JOSE BLAS LORENZO FLORIDA DEPT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICE4050 ESPLANADE WAYTALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | The Energy Direct Program is operated by the Florida Department of Management Services to provide energy savings to all levels of government It is also a resource for information about electricity and energy performance contracting The program manage and purchases interstate natural gas from the Florida Gas Transmission line (Texas to Florida) for consumption by all levels of government through term contracts The program provides the management and purchase of gasoline, fuel oil and liquefied- Petroleum via volume purchasing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |