Drawing for TLC

USPTO serial 76043842

TLC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TLC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIMBERLY KATHERINE TILL

1710 SIXTH AVE NBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-2015UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042legal services, namely legal counseling in the fields of-- entrepreneurial resource services, seed and venture capital financing, strategic alliances, internet privacy counseling, internet regulatory counseling, internet litigation, website host agreements, domain name transactions, corporate mergers and acquisitions, public and private company securities, initial public offerings, follow on financing, technology transfers, licensing, antitrust, intellectual property, equity incentives/employee benefits, employment law, tax, litigation, real estate, environmental, credit lending and wealth managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance