USPTO serial 76044046
EL TORITO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EL TORITO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jimmy Chen
Jimmy Chen Dentons US LLP2030 Main StreetSuite 1000Irvine, CA 92614-7239Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed foods, namely, beans, including refried beans, chilies, peppers, tomatoes, cheese, food dip, bean dip, cheese dip; frozen, prepared, and packaged entrees consisting primarily of meat; frozen, prepared, and packaged entrees consisting primarily of poultry; frozen, prepared, and packaged entrees consisting primarily of vegetables; frozen, prepared, and packaged meals consisting primarily of meat; frozen, prepared, and packaged meals consisting primarily of poultry; frozen, prepared, packaged meals consisting primarily of vegetables; and processed vegetables, including beans, chilies, peppers, and tomatoes in combination or separate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |