Drawing for IONMYBIZ

USPTO serial 76044094

IONMYBIZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IONMYBIZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa T. Oratz

LISA T ORATZ PERKINS COIE411 - 108TH AVE NE STE 1800BELLEVUE, WA 98004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services in the nature of providing on-line web portal services to enable third parties to enhance their operations, namely providing temporary use of non-downloadable software that allows third parties to create and publish signs, labels, documents and promotional and informational content associated with business, organization, team or family activities or operations and that enables third parties to communicate with customers, associates, members or peers via print and electronic services, providing databases, content and information on a wide variety of topics of interest to businesses, organizations, teams and families and providing information by means of linking to web sites in a wide variety of fields of interest to businesses, organizations, teams and families; automated web page services, namely web site design, development, publishing and hostingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 25, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 4, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance