USPTO serial 76044536
360
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 360?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey T. Haley
Mark G. Sandbaken Townsend and Townsend and Crew, LLPTwo Embarcadero Center8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111-3834Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for generating and providing indexes of computer networks, where the network may include the global computer network, an intranet, or a wide area network, namely - (1) providing host computer sites on the network with agent programs which extract data about resources on each host site, (2) gathering from host sites data about resources on each host site, (3) building a searchable index or catalog or database of resources on the network, (4) providing searches of the index or catalog or database of resources on the network, and (5) generating comparisons of indexed resources on the network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 360 POWERED CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by 360 POWERED CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Activelndexing.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named 360
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |