USPTO serial 76044931
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges& Diane E. Turriff
ANDREW P BRIDGES& DIANE E TURRIFF WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATIPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Operating marketplaces for sellers of goods and services in the fields of motion pictures, television programs, and other multimedia and single-media programs and content via computer and communications networks; scheduling services, namely managing the scheduling of the creation, marketing, and distribution of motion pictures, television programs, and other multimedia and single-media programs and content over computer and communications networks; procurement for others, namely purchasing goods and services used in the creation, marketing, and distribution of motion pictures, television programs, and other multimedia and single-media programs and content over computer and communications networks; providing financial planning tools, budgeting tools, and budgets for others in the fields of motion pictures, television programs, and other multimedia and single-media programs and content | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing information in regard to motion pictures, television programs, other multimedia and single-media programs and content, and the creation, marketing, and distribution of same, over communications and computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely hosting, creating and maintaining web sites and private computer networks accessible only by authorized users for others; providing electronic bulletin boards and message boards in the field of motion pictures, television programs, and other multimedia and single-media programs and content; providing a computer database accessible by computer and communications networks in the fields of creation, marketing, and distribution of motion pictures, television programs, and other multimedia and single-media programs and content; computer services, namely providing search engines for obtaining data on computer and communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |