Drawing for RELAXOR

USPTO serial 76045082

RELAXOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DEBRA ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RELAXOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rachel Saldana

Rachel Saldana Baker Botts L.L.P.98 San Jacinto Blvd.1500 San Jacinto CenterAustin, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electric shavers, electric moustache and beard trimmerACTIVE—
009Electronic soothing sound generator with or without a light, with or without radio; electromechanical personal alert system comprising a vibrator and a controller for use with bedding as well as commercial and domestic vehicular seating; electric hair brushesACTIVE—
011Hot tubs, whirlpools, and whirlpool baths; and decorative water fountains, with pump for water circulationACTIVE—
020Inflatable air seat toppers and cushions; lighted and non-lighted mirrors for use in personal groomingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 8, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance