USPTO serial 76045370
THE WEB-TO-DATABASE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE WEB-TO-DATABASE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
93175 Bagnolet, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF COMMUNICATION BY COMPUTERS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, MONITORS, KEYBOARDS, MICE, CONTROL CONSOLES, DISK DRIVES, DIGITIZERS, AND PRINTED CIRCUITS; BLANK MAGNETIC COMPUTER DISKS; COMPUTER MEMORIES; ACCESS CONTROL APPARATUS FOR TREATMENT OF INFORMATION, NAMELY BAR CODE READERS; MAGNETIC CODED CARDS; PRERECORDED VIDEOGRAMS AND PHONOGRAMS FEATURING MUSIC, FILMS, SHOWS, AND SPORTS; PRERECORDED AUDIO TAPES, MAGNETIC TAPES, VIDEO TAPES AND AUDIO AND VIDEO COMPACT DISCS FEATURING MUSIC, FILMS, SHOWS AND SPORTS; OPTICAL DISCS; MAGNETIC DISCS, NAMELY, PRERECORDED MAGNETIC COMPUTER DISCS FOR USE IN CONNECTING COMPUTERS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND IN DOWNLOADING DATA | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY COMMUNICATIONS BY RADIO, TELEVISION BROADCASTING; COMMUNICATIONS BY TELEGRAPH; COMMUNICATIONS BY COMPUTERS, NAMELY, BROADCASTING OF PROGRAMS FOR OTHERS BY MEANS OF RADIO, TELEVISION, VIDEOGRAM, PHONOGRAM, CABLE, HERTZIAN WAY AND SATELLITES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING SERVICES; RENTAL OF ACCESS TIME TO COMPUTER DATABASES IN THE FIELDS OF CINEMA, INFORMATION, NEWS, MUSIC, SPORTS, AND ENTERTAINMENT; CONCEPTION AND COLLABORATION OF SOFTWARE, NAMELY, DESIGN OR SOFTWARE AND WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; UPDATING OF SOFTWARE; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER NETWORKING; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND AUDIOVISUAL PRESENTATIONS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; RENTAL OF COMPUTERS; RESEARCH OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS OF COMPUTERS; AND DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTRONIC COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |