Drawing for CHARTBUILDER

USPTO serial 76045417

CHARTBUILDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARTBUILDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. McFarland

JAMES BLASINGAME OPSION MEDICAL INC694 RIMINI RDDEL MAR, CA 92014UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Electronic transmission of messages and data between physicians and patientsACTIVE
042Computer services, namely providing an interactive computer database that allows remote interviewing of patients, selecting and providing medical information to patient and physicians over an on-line electronic communications network, creating medical summaries including creating chart notes for physicians, and storing medical recordsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 5, 2002TCALTEAS CORR ADDRESS REQUEST RECEIVED BUT NOT PROCESSED LOC IS TTAB
Jun 28, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jan 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 18, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 15, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance