USPTO serial 76046304
I SCREAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I SCREAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd E. Stockwell
TODD E STOCKWELL STOCKWELL & ASSOCIATES PSC861 CORPORATE DR STE 201LEXINGTON, KY 40503-5434UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICE CREAM, FROZEN YOGURT, SHERBET, FROZEN CONFECTIONS AND FLAVORED ICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |