Drawing for SENIOR GOLD

USPTO serial 76046389

SENIOR GOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENIOR GOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Win R. Richey

ANNE E FERGUSON HUNTER RICHEY DI BENEDETTO & EISENBEIS520 CAPITOL MALL, STE 400SACRAMENTO, CA 95814UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036organizing prepaid health plansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 3, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 21, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 21, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 11, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 25, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance