Drawing for COLORQUICK.COM

USPTO serial 76046417

COLORQUICK.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORQUICK.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JORDAN A. LAVINE

JORDAN A LAVINE AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER& FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ 2005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19130

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Information management for the graphic arts industry including but not limited to pre-press services and digital asset managementACTIVE—
042Information management for the graphic arts industry including but not limited to pre-press services and digital asset managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 8, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance