USPTO serial 76046417
COLORQUICK.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLORQUICK.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JORDAN A. LAVINE
JORDAN A LAVINE AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER& FELD LLPONE COMMERCE SQ 2005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Information management for the graphic arts industry including but not limited to pre-press services and digital asset management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information management for the graphic arts industry including but not limited to pre-press services and digital asset management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |