USPTO serial 76046644
CHROMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2763146Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHROMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CINCINNATI, OH
INDIAN ORCHARD, MA
Chemtech Finishing Systems, Inc.
Farmington Hills, MI
Chemtech Finishing Systems, Inc.
Farmington Hills, MI
Chemtech Finishing Systems, Inc.
Farmington Hills, MI
ST. LOUIS, MO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chromate conversion coating chemicals for corrosion protection of metallic surfaces | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DUBOIS CHEMICALS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HEATBATH CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Chemtech Finishing Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chemtech Finishing Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Chemtech Finishing Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CHEMTECH HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named CHROMAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 24, 2018 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |