Drawing for RADICAL BUILDER

USPTO serial 76047019

RADICAL BUILDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RADICAL BUILDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Fish

ROBERT D FISH RUTAN & TUCKERP O BOX 1950COSTA MESA, CA 92628-1950UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used to embed audio, video, or graphics directly in e-mail without attachment filesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 24, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 24, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 24, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Apr 16, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 6, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 16, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 2, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 6, 2000AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance