USPTO serial 76047036
BEJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2526930Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 8, 2002
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Willliam R Bradley, Jr.
Willliam R Bradley, Jr. GLANKLER BROWN PLLCONE COMMERCE SQUARE17th FloorMEMPHIS, TN 38103-2566Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair gels, hair shampoos, hair setting lotions, hair styling lotions, hair conditioners, hair relaxers, hair dressings and permanent wave solutions, dry scalp lotions | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Feb 4, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |