USPTO serial 76047170
TWISTIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'LEAR, MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWISTIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yvette Y Auyeung
YVETTE Y AUYEUNG LAZARE POTTER GIACOVAS & KRANJAC LLP950 THIRD AVE 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | TUBULAR ROLLED-WAFER COOKIES CONTAINING A CREAM-BASED FILLING, BUT EXCLUDING CORN BASED OR CHEESE FLAVORED PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |