USPTO serial 76047380
EASY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EASY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
JAMES MCCARTHY KATZ TELLER BRANT & HILD255 E FIFTH ST STE 2400CINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | SECURITY DEVICES, NAMELY, LOCKABLE CAPS, STRAPS AND CONTAINERS MADE PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC FOR PREVENTING THEFT OF GOODS BY CONSUMERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |