USPTO serial 76048323
GO 2 ONLINE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GO 2 ONLINE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Reed
DIANE M REED KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DRSIXTEENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PHYSICAL AND ELECTRONIC NAVIGATION AND INDEX SERVICES AVAILABLE VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND WIRELESS COMPUTER COMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING A DATABASE OF ALPHA-NUMERIC PHYSICAL AND ELECTRONIC LOCATION IDENTIFIERS FOR SEARCHING, RETRIEVING, CATEGORIZING AND OBTAINING WEB SITE INFORMATION, INFORMATION ON PHYSICAL LOCATIONS, AND OTHER INFORMATION ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION, WEB SITES, PHYSICAL LOCATIONS, AND OTHER INFORMATION RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK RELATED TO LOCATIONS OF WEB SITES AND HOME PAGES AND RELATED TO PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS; PROVIDING MAPS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING ON-LINE LINKS TO INFORMATION, WEB SITES AND HOME PAGES OF OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; AND PROVIDING GENERAL INFORMATION OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF NEWS, SPORTS, WEATHER, CURRENT EVENTS, FINANCES, GEOGRAPHY, MAPS, AND REFERENCE MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |