USPTO serial 76048436
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Hobbs, Jr.
MICHAEL D HOBBS JR TROUTMAN SANDERS LLPBANK OF AMERICA PLZ600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications apparatus and instruments namely, optical switching apparatus, network cards, modems, and parts thereof for the aforesaid goods, computer cables, optical fiber cables; electrical and electronic communications and telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely switching apparatus for use in telecommunications to enable connection to databases and the Internet, optical and electro-optical apparatus and instruments; computer software, namely recorded computer operating software for use in the field of telecommunications, optical network system management and network monitoring software; computer hardware and firmware; used for the provision of telecommunications services; magnetically encoded cards linked to telecommunications and Internet services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |