Drawing for INLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

USPTO serial 76048641

INLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INLINE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sally M. Abel

SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CENTRALIZING THE SCHEDULING AND MANAGEMENT OF SHARED DATA, WORKSPACE RESOURCES AND LOGISTICS, AND MESSAGINGACTIVE—
035BUSINESS NETWORKING SERVICESACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; NETWORK CONFERENCING SERVICES; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATION CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF CENTRALIZED DATA, WORKSPACE RESOURCES AND LOGISTICS, AND MESSAGING OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND A WIDE VARIETY OF NETWORKSACTIVE—
042INTERNET SERVICES, NAMELY, CENTRALIZING, SCHEDULING, DISTRIBUTING, AND MANAGING SHARED DATA, WORKSPACE RESOURCES AND LOGISTICS, AND MESSAGING OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND A WIDE VARIETY OF NETWORKSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 28, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance