Drawing for WOLFPAK

USPTO serial 76048957

WOLFPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WOLFPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CLIFFORD R. PEARL

CLIFFORD R PEARL SOLOMON PEARL BLUM HEYMANN & STICH LLP1801 BROADWAY STE 500DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009product development softwareACTIVEApr 26, 2000
035business management and consultation services, namely project content application, requirements prioritizations and project scheduling services for others relating to new product development and software utilizationACTIVEApr 26, 2000
042Technical consulting services, namely software development for others, requirements prioritization, new product development consultation and technical consultation in the field of project management implementationACTIVEApr 26, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance