USPTO serial 76049069
INOVANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INOVANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foster City, CA
Foster City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENISE Y. KUWABARA
DENISE Y KUWABARA VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION900 METRO CTR BLVDMAILSTOP M1-11AFOSTER CITY, CA 94404Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware, computer software for use in database management, word processing, creating spreadsheets, calculation of risks in risk management and in facilitating data entry in voice, text and pen; computer operating systems; computer utility programs; computer programs for use in network management, namely, computer programs for network security, communications programs for connecting computer network users and global computer networks, computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer peripherals; computer programs for use in viewing, organizing and editing documents, images, electronic mail messages and private network and global computer network communications; computer programs for use in creating graphical presentations, and user manuals sold in connection with all the foregoing, all of the foregoing in the fields of financial transaction processing and payment technologies services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |