USPTO serial 76049152
.WEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with .WEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Luis Obispo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY J NELSON
David J. Steele CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMMERCIAL INFORMATION AND DIRECTORY SERVICES FEATURING DIRECTORIES FOR LOCATING THE COMPUTER NETWORK ADDRESSES AND DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION OF ENTITIES;COMPUTER NETWORK ADDRESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ENABLING ENTITIES TO ACCESS, ADD, MODIFY OR DELETE INFORMATION RELATING TO THEIR COMPUTER NETWORK ADDRESSES; PROVIDING A DIRECTORY OF ORGANIZATIONS, INDIVIDUALS, ADDRESSES, AND RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE THROUGH THE USE OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 1996 |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC MAIL AND ELECTRONIC STORE AND FORWARD MESSAGING OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; REDIRECTION OF WEB SITE ACCESS OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DOMAIN NAME REGISTRY SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FOR OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; REGISTERING, SECURING, RESERVING AND TRACKING NETWORK ADDRESSES ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | Jul 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |