USPTO serial 76049327
COSMOPOLITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COSMOPOLITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry S. Agdern
BARRY S AGDERN THE HEARST CORPORATION959 EIGHTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Decorative pillows, chair pads, table rounds, namely, round table tops that would be put on bases | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Waste baskets | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bedding, namely, bed sheets, pillow cases, comforters, bedspreads, coverlets, comforters, bed pads, quilts, duvet covers, duvets, pillow shams ruffled bed skirts; window treatments, namely, draperies, and curtains | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named COSMOPOLITAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |