USPTO serial 76049667
DIAMONDWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 1, 2004
- Examiner
- BROWN, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIAMONDWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NORTH HAVEN, CT
SAN JOSE, CA
RIVERSIDE, CT
GREENWICH, CT
CAYUGA VENTURE FUND II LLC AS AGENT
ITHACA, NY
Other trademarks owned by CAYUGA VENTURE FUND II LLC AS AGENT
ITHACA, NY
ITHACA, NY
Sunnyvale, CA
Sunnyvale, CA
SUNNYVALE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Farah P. Bhatti
Farah P. Bhatti Buchalter, A Professional Corporation18400 Von Karman Ave, Suite 800Los Angeles, CA 92612-0514UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for routing and forwarding data and communications and for network management for use in the field of optical telecommunications networking technology, namely optical network applications, photonic switching, embedded routing and signaling support and bandwidth management together with user manuals in print and electronic format provided therewith; optical telecommunications network components, namely optical and photonic switches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 8, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BARTELS, HENRY E.
- Other trademarks owned by RIVIERA SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BARTELS, PHILIP H.
- Other trademarks owned by BARTELS, KENNETH G.
- Other trademarks owned by CAYUGA VENTURE FUND II LLC AS AGENT
- Other trademarks owned by WIDDING, FRED B.
- Other trademarks owned by SHULL, ARTHUR
- Other trademarks owned by Calient Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Calient Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CALIENT NETWORKS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DIAMONDWAVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 22, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |