Drawing for VPN ON DEMAND

USPTO serial 76050031

VPN ON DEMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VPN ON DEMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roy Machaalany

Roy Machaalany Flansberry Menard and Associates208-4275 Innes Rd.Ottawa, Ontario, K1C1T1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Operating system software in the field of secure data transactions that permit the creation of virtual private networks (VPNs)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED—
Jun 16, 2003AAUDAMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED—
Jun 16, 2003IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Jun 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 5, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance