USPTO serial 76050032
DULZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DULZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Delbridge
ROBERT F DELBRIDGE GOWLING, STRATHY & HENDERSONSTE 560 120 KING ST WHAMILTON, ON L8P 4V2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POTATO CHIPS; SOUP MIXES; SOUPS, DAIRY-BASED BEVERAGES; VEGETABLE-BASED BEVERAGES; POTATO-BASED SNACK FOOD; AND FRUIT-BASED SNACK FOOD | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | COFFEE; TEA; PASTRIES; CANDY; CANDY MINTS; BISCUITS, CHEWING GUM; BREAKFAST CEREALS; CRACKERS; CHOCOLATE; MUFFINS; POPPED POPCORN; MICROWAVE POPCORN; PUDDINGS; GRANOLA-BASED SNACK BARS; RICE-BASED SNACK FOOD; WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOOD; CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOOD; FLAVORED AND SWEETENED GELATINES; GRAIN-BASED BEVERAGES; AND HERBAL BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC PUNCH; NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT COOLERS; FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS; COLAS; SPRING WATER; AND NON-ALCOHOLIC BEER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |