USPTO serial 76050715
PATRIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATRIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CARIBBEAN DISTILLERS CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
ROAD BAY, AI
Other trademarks owned by CARIBBEAN DISTILLERS CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
CARIBBEAN DISTILLERS CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Las Vegas, NV
Other trademarks owned by CARIBBEAN DISTILLERS CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Caribbean Distillers Corporation
Road Bay, AI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Sherman
CHRISTINE L LOFGREN ESQ JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS, 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | VODKA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARIBBEAN DISTILLERS CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CARIBBEAN DISTILLERS CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Caribbean Distillers Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named PATRIA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |