USPTO serial 76050863
THE KOOL AND THE GANG EXPERIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE KOOL AND THE GANG EXPERIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
Maplewood, NJ
Maplewood, NJ
West Orange, NJ
West Orange, NJ
Montclair, NJ
Montclain, NJ
Montclair, NJ
Montclair, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Ingber
MARK J INGBER WATERS MCPHERSON MCNEILL PCP O BOX 1560SECAUCUS, NJ 07096-1560UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, George
- Other trademarks owned by Brown, George
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Claydes E.
- Other trademarks owned by Smith, Claydes E.
- Other trademarks owned by Bell, Robert E.
- Other trademarks owned by Bell, Robert E.
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Dennis
- Other trademarks owned by Thomas, Dennis
- Other trademarks owned by Bell, Ronald
- Other trademarks owned by Bell, Ronald
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named THE KOOL AND THE GANG EXPERIENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |