USPTO serial 76051058
TRAFFICMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2992726Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 2005
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRAFFICMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buckinghamshire, MK14 6DX, GB
Buckinghamshire, MK14 6DX, GB
Buckinghamshire, MK14 6DX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLARENCE A. GREEN
JANIK MARCOVICI PERMAN & GREEN LLP425 POST RDFAIRFIELD, CT 06824-6232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments for provision of road traffic information, for provision of information as to road traffic congestion and speed and about individual road vehicles, for road traffic monitoring, and for monitoring of road traffic congestion and speed and of individual road vehicles; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments locatable in vehicle interiors for providing visual and oral information relating to road traffic conditions; electronic equipment in the nature of numeric, graphic and textual data processors, wireless and fixed electronic transmitters and receivers, and central electronic graphical display systems for monitoring and communicating with individual road vehicles; control centers for performing numeric, graphic and textual data processing, wireless and fixed electronic transmission and reception and central electronic graphical displaying for monitoring and communicating with individual road vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2005 |
| 039 | Provision of road traffic information; provision of information as to road traffic congestion and speed and about individual road vehicles; road traffic monitoring; monitoring of road traffic congestion and speed and of individual road vehicles, and consultation with regard to the provision of such information and the performing of such monitoring and the related equipment used in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Trafficmaster plc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trafficmaster plc.
- Other trademarks owned by Trafficmaster plc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named TRAFFICMASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |