USPTO serial 76051063
RENDEZVOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RENDEZVOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C. STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL DRUG STORES, RETAIL GROCERY STORES, RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING CONVENIENCE STORE ITEMS, RETAIL SHOPS FEATURING, FLOWERS, SUPERMARKETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | LEASING OF APARTMENTS, RENTAL OF APARTMENTS, APARTMENT HOUSE MANAGEMENT, REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES, MORTGAGE BROKERAGE SERVICES, REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT, REAL ESTATE TIME SHARING, REAL ESTATE LISTING, REAL ESTATE AGENCIES, AND REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | GOLF CLUB SERVICES, HEALTH CLUB, EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AT THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY LEVELS AN DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIAL IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, PROVIDING TENNIS COURT SERVICES, PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES, GOLF COURSES; LIBRARIES; PHYSICAL FITNESS INSTRUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE INTERESTS OF HOMEOWNERS, HOTEL CONCIERGE SERVICES, HAIRDRESSING SALONS AND SERVICES, BEAUTY SALONS, MASSAGE, PHYSICAL FITNESS CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Maryvale Village LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RENDEZVOUS COLORADO, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RENDEZVOUS COLORADO, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RENDEZVOUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |