USPTO serial 76051090
JAKE'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JAKE'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40212 Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. Raman
WILLIAM D RAMAN WONG CABELLOPO BOX 685108AUSTIN, TX 78768-5108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Outer clothing, namely shirts, pants, blouses, skirts, T-shirts, tank tops, dresses, belts, socks, scarves, mufflers, footwear, coats, hats, gloves, jackets, ties, pajamas, robes, neckwear, hosiery, stockings, shorts, swimwear, vests, caps, and baby clothing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |