USPTO serial 76051195
GONE FISHING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GONE FISHING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie L. Boccadoro
VALERIE L BOCCADORO OSTRAGER CHONG & FLAHERTY, PC825 3RD AVE 30TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-7519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | FISHING EQUIPMENT; NAMELY, BAIT (ARTIFICIAL), BAIT (PACKAGED, FREEZE-DRIED), FISHING BUOYS, FISHING CREELS, WINGING MATERIAL FOR FISHING JIGS AND STREAMERS, FISHING FLIES, FISHING FLOATS, FLY BOXES, FISHING HOOKS, FISHING LEADERS, LINES, LURE BOXES, LURE PARTS, LURES, LURES (ARTIFICIAL), PLUGS, FISHING REELS, FISHING RODS, ROD BLANKS, ROD HANDLES, ROD HOLDERS, FISHING SPINNERS, FISHING TACKLE AND TACKLE BOXES, FISHING WORMS (ARTIFICIAL), FISHING POLE HOLDERS WORN ON THE BODY, FISHING SAFETY HARNESSES, AND FISHING NETS FOR SPORTSMEN (HAND HELD) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |