USPTO serial 76051207
HURRICANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HURRICANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheldon Palmer
SHELDON PALMER GALVIN & PALMER630 3RD AVE FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10017-6705UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio equipment and accessories therefor, namely, speaker wire; audio cable; RCA cable; microphones; mixers, samplers and cross-overs; audio and video CD recorders and players, turntables, sound effects machines, digital echo machines, microphone mixers, stereo mixers, power amplifiers, stereo cross-overs, graphic equalizers, digital samplers, DJ racks and coffins, power conditioners, headphones and microphones; automotive lighting fixtures and accessories therefor, namely, high intensity discharge lamps, projector lights, off-road head lamps, fog lights, reading and safety lights, brake lights, neon lights, light bars, wiring kits, mounting brackets, and inverters; and automobile alarms and accessories, namely, alarms, starter systems therefor, keyless entry and remote starting units, replacement transmitters, command link paging units, add-on remote starting modules, VATS systems, anti-theft system by-passes, universal transponder system by-passes, zone proximity sensors, air resonance shock and glass breakage sensors, shock sensors, glass breakage sensors, tilt switches, pin switches, sensor expansion modules, magnetic read switches, sliding door contact switches, power window roll-up modules, single channel receivers, sirens, paging systems, relays, sockets, LED-SP's, condenser microphones, key lock switches, batteries, passive starter interrupt systems and flashing strobe lights | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |